4 Component Obsolescence Trends Worth Watching as 2026 Kicks Off
4 Component Obsolescence Trends Worth Watching as 2026 Kicks Off
AI chipmakers are rattling the cage when it comes to semiconductors, but all that noise is obscuring the fact that most applications rely on mainstay electronic components such as microprocessors, microcontrollers, FPGAs, power management ICs, clock and frequency generators, and prior-generation chips to drive performance and functionality. For engineers and procurement teams, reliable access to bread-and-butter components can make or break a production line and have expensive consequences when unobtainable parts impact long-term programs.
- Buffer inventory burn-off – The manufacturing and supply chain issues underlying the COVID-19 pandemic prompted companies to stockpile essential components, muting demand for the past several quarters. While creating a sense of stability, the inevitable drawdown of that inventory may catch original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) off guard when it comes time to procure parts that are no longer in abundance on their own shelves or in supplier and distributor warehouses. In the notoriously cyclical semiconductor industry, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Keeping a sharp eye on current stores and future availability will be an essential task for procurement teams in the new year.
- Normalization in Europe – Inventory stockpiles are being whittled away across industries, but the rate varies by region. On balance, Europe’s economy rests on mature, steadfast sectors such as the industrial and automotive sectors. The demand curve tends to lag North America and the Asia Pacific because the equipment in those industries tends to have a longer product life. Nonetheless, book-to-bill ratios are rising. The European Semiconductor Industry Association is forecasting 5.6 percent growth in semiconductor revenue in Europe in 2026, with sustained demand for the next two years. Logic and memory devices are leading the way. Other product categories will recover gradually.
- Accelerating component lifecycles – The speed of innovation is driving original component manufacturers (OCMs) to accelerate product obsolescence as the thirst for AI influences electronic components across the spectrum. Whether they’re advancing portfolios to remain competitive, shedding duplicative products after an acquisition, or the fabs they work with are retooling for iterative form factors, the tendency to focus investment on promising technologies with higher profit margins directly impacts the availability of parts already in market. Last-time buy windows of 12 to 24 months can fall victim to more pressing business concerns, leaving customers without a good solution for acquiring the critical parts they anticipate needing well beyond the cut-off date. Deploying the latest AI-driven forecasting tools and keeping abreast of manufacturer timelines is an absolute must.
- Embracing manufacturing services – The price of obsolescence is often underestimated, but acute need has a way of sharpening the senses. The ramifications of stalled production reverberate beyond the balance sheet as delivery and field deployment timelines are impacted. In heavily regulated industries, the cost of equipment redesign, testing and recertification ranges from prohibitive to astronomical. While this obviously affects OEMs, self-inflicted damage is a risk for OCMs that chase the next big thing at the expense of current customer needs. Licensing authorized partners to produce EOL components on the OCM’s behalf—components that are identical in form, fit and function — avoids unnecessarily irritating those who pay the bills.
Prescience, Not Panic
Obsolescence management is a discipline that spans the entire equipment lifecycle, from design through disposition — and it is a discipline that stands apart from engineering and procurement alone. During the design phase, qualifying components through the lens of inevitable obsolescence complements performance and functionality assessments, serving to mitigate accessibility issues down the road. As programs extend, close ties to OCMs can help OEMs keep track of impending part change notifications (PCNs) and give them the runway they need to implement Plan B. On the back end, working with a specialty distributor that can still provide authorized parts that have reached EOL status, is strategy that avoids the risk of the gray market. Woven throughout it all is a resilient supply chain able to shift seamlessly when disruption looms. Environmental and social compliance concerns are a part of the equation, too.
Collaboration between OCMs, OEMs and their supply chain partners is the only way to stay ahead of fast-moving technology without negatively impacting project schedules and program budgets, especially when legacy equipment is engineered to last decades longer than the parts that comprise it. Make the time. Make the investment necessary to lower risk. In an industry as volatile and innovation-hungry as technology, a prescient, proactive approach to risk mitigation is the difference between profitability and panic.
To read the article on Procurement Pro, click here: https://procurementpro.com/what-teams-need-to-know-about-mil-aero-in-emea/
